Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nixon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 7, 2012

NIXON
v.
ASTRUE

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Michael R. Wilner

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable Michael R. Wilner

Veronica McKamie n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL

Plaintiff filed this pro se appeal from an adverse Social Security determination in June 2012. Shortly after filing the action, the Court issued an order setting forth the procedures to be followed in the case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, the order expressly required Plaintiff to serve the agency with the summons and complaint. (Docket # 6.) Plaintiff did not request that the Marshals Service serve the complaint for her.

According to the Court's review of the docket, Plaintiff has not completed service of the complaint within the 120-day period specified by rule, and has not filed proof of service of process. Additionally, no defendant has appeared in the action to date. Plaintiff has not requested an extension of the statutory time period. As a result, the action is subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute.

However, in the interest of justice, the Court will give Plaintiff one opportunity to explain why the statutory service period should be extended so that she can effect service. Therefore, it is ordered that Plaintiff must show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 5 pages excluding exhibits) by or before November 26, 2012, addressing the issues set forth above and demonstrating valid service. If no timely response is filed, the Court will recommend dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 41.

20121107

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.