UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
November 7, 2012
ROBERT DODSON, PLAINTIFF,
PETSMART, INC. DBA PETSMART #0048; THEODORE P. KOROS, TRUSTEE OF THE KOROS FAMILY TRUST UNDER AGREEMETN DATED MAY 8, 2012; ANGELA R. KOROS, TRUSTEE OF THE KOROS FAMILY TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED MAY 8, 2012; SOPHIA PETER KELLEY; THOMAS KOROS; NICHOLAS KOROS; PETER T. KOROS, TRUSTEE OF THE KOROS FAMILY TRUST U/D/T DATED JANUARY 25, 1988; ELENI P. KOROS, TRUSTEE U/D/T DATED JANUARY 25, 1988,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
STIPULATION FOR 3-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT PETSMART, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDERP .C. O N STIPULATION AND ORDER 12cv2144
Plaintiff Robert Dodson ("Dodson") and Defendant PetSmart, Inc. dba PetSmart #0048 ("PetSmart"), hereby stipulate to a 3-day extension of time so that PetSmart shall have until November 9, 2012, to respond to the Complaint. PetSmart's response is currently due today, November 6, 2012. Good cause exists for this extension because the parties have discussed the alleged access barriers listed in the Complaint and believe that an agreement to resolve the ADA access claims against PetSmart is imminent. In particular, permitting this short extension of time to respond to the Complaint will allow PetSmart to avoid the cost of preparing and filing a response if, as expected, the parties are able to finalize an agreement to resolve Dodson's claims against PetSmart.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 6, 2012 By: /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III LYNN HUBBARD, III
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT DODSON
Dated: November 6, 2012
By: /s/ Michael G. Leggieri
MICHAEL G. LEGGIERI LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.