UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 8, 2012
GOPI VEDACHALAM AND KANGANA BERI, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD, AN INDIAN CORPORATION; AND TATA SONS, LTD, AN INDIAN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862) email@example.com 2 Rosha Jones (State Bar No. 279143) firstname.lastname@example.org . 3 RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 2150 4 San Francisco, CA 94 i 11 Telephone: (415) 421-1800 5 Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) email@example.com 7 Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) firstname.lastname@example.org 8 Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) email@example.com 9 LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 10 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 956-1000 11 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008 6 12 Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California 13 Classes
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 19 STAY COURT DEADLINES STIPULATION
PlaintiffsGopiVedachalam and Kangana Beri ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and 3 the PlaintiffNational and California Classes, and Defendants Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. and 4 Tata Sons, Ltd. (together, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 5 WHEREAS, the parties conducted a private mediation before Susan Haldeman on 6 October 16 and 17, 2012, as well as additional telephonic conferences with Ms. Haldeman;
7 WHEREAS, the parties are continuing their mediation discussions in an effort to resolve 8 this matter;
9 WHEREAS, to facilitate those discussions, the parties respectfully request that this Court 10 stay all Court deadlines for 90 days, though the parties intend to use their best efforts to complete 11 their negotiation within the next 45 days and inform the Court of their progress at that time;
12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that this litigation
be stayed until
13 February 4, 2013.
1 In light of the parties' stipulation regarding their ongoing attempts to resolve this matter, 2 the Court concludes that, in the interests of judicial efficiency, all litigation and all deadlines in 3 the matter should be stayed, and are hereby stayed, for 90 days.
4 The parties are to provide the Court with an update oftheir status by February 4, 2013.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED. All existing deadlines are extended by 90 days, except the pretrial and trial dates.
United States District Court Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.