Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Jane Doe and Anne Raskin v. City and County of San Francisco
November 8, 2012
JANE DOE AND ANNE RASKIN,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;
JANICE MADSEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; KIM DOUGHERTY, AN INDIVIDUAL;
AUDREY HILLMAN AN INDIVIDUAL; HEATHER GRIVES, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1-10,
DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL
dismissing the above-captioned matter with prejudice as all terms of the settlement agreement have 5 been met. 6 7 Dated: November 6, 2012 SHEA LAW OFFICES 9 10
All parties to the underlying action hereby stipulate and hereby move the Court for an order
By: _/s/ Mary Shea Hagebols_____________ MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS Dated: November 6, 2012 WILLOUGHBY DOYLE, LLP 14 15 Dated: November 6, 2012 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney ELIZABETH S. SALVESON Chief Labor Attorney LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Deputy City Attorneys By: _/s/ Markus Willoughby_____ MARKUS WILLOUGHBY Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAURA MOYLAN and ANNE RASKIN By: /s/ _Lawrence Hecimovich_____ LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JANICE MADSEN, an individual; KIM DOUGHERTY, an individual; HEATHER GRIVES, an individual
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, THIS MATTER IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...