Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gary Kremen v. Michael Joseph Cohen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


November 9, 2012

GARY KREMEN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL JOSEPH COHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND FNBPAY CORPORATION, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

Plaintiff Gary Kremen filed this action on November 8, 2011, against Defendants Michael Joseph Cohen and FNBPay Corporation (collectively "Defendants"), upon information and belief 19 that Defendants are the transferees of certain property, including money, fraudulently transferred to 20 each of them by Stephen Michael Cohen, an individual against whom Plaintiff has an enforceable 21 and unpaid money judgment in the amount of $67,867,053.36. See ECF No. 1. On October 15, 22 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 156. On October 29, 2012, 23 Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 158. 24

Defendants' reply was due on November 6, 2012. See Civil Local Rule 7--3. However, on 25 November 7, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to extend time to file the reply and declarations in 26 support of the reply, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6--3. ECF No. 160. 27 28

The Court, having considered Defendants' motion and the exhibits filed in support thereof, 2 finds good cause to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their reply. Accordingly, the Court 3 hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion. Defendants shall have until November 13, 2012, to file 4 with the Court their reply and supporting declarations in support of the motion for summary 5 judgment. 6

IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8

20121109

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.