Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

John Doe, Jack Roe, and California Reform Sex Offender Laws, On Behalf of Themselves v. Kamala D. Harris

November 14, 2012

JOHN DOE, JACK ROE, AND CALIFORNIA REFORM SEX OFFENDER LAWS, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, AND CITY OF ALAMEDA,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Thelton E. Henderson

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION 15 OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Courtroom: 12

Judge: The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson Trial Date: Not Set 20 Action Filed: November 6, 2012

On November 7, 2012, this Court granted Plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining 24 order ("TRO") pending a hearing on a motion whether a preliminary injunction should issue 25 against Defendant Kamala D. Harris, California Attorney General (the "Attorney General") in 26 this action. In issuing the order, the Court invited the parties to meet and confer to attempt to 27 reach an agreement on an extension of the TRO and a briefing and hearing schedule on the 28

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The parties, through their respective counsel, have met and conferred and have reached an agreement regarding the continuance of the TRO, the briefing and 2 hearing schedule for Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and other issues. 3

6 issue of class certification at this time and without prejudice to the Attorney General to later 7 challenge class certification. 8

10 relief granted by the Court will apply both to the named Plaintiffs and to all persons who are 11 required to register under California Penal Code § 290, including those whose duty to register 12 arises during the pendency of the TRO and any preliminary injunctive relief. 13

14 officers" shall be deleted. However, the California Department of Justice and local law 15 enforcement will not require registrants to submit the information covered by the TRO so long as 16 the TRO remains in effect. 17

18 until the Court issues its ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction or January 11, 19

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND FILE UNDER SEAL

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

CLASS CERTIFICATION

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction will be resolved without litigating the

SCOPE AND EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

2. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the TRO and any ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.