The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION'S RENEWED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION OF DISPOSITIVE MATTER REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dept.: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
Farella Braun Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400
This matter comes before the Court on the Renewed Administrative Motion of Defendant Volterra Semiconductor Corporation to seal portions of its Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For 3 De Novo Determination Of Dispositive Matter Referred To Magistrate Judge Or, In The 4 Alternative, Motion For Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order Of Magistrate Judge. 5 Having considered Volterra's motion and supporting papers, as well as the pleadings and 6 materials lodged in this matter, and the Court's prior Order on this subject (Dkt. No. 153), the 7 Court finds good cause and GRANTS the motion to seal as follows.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in addition to the portion of Volterra's Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For De Novo Determination Of Dispositive Matter Referred To Magistrate 10 Judge Or, In The Alternative, Motion For Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order Of 11 Magistrate Judge the Court's November 9, 2012 Order (Dkt. No. 153) has ordered should be 12 sealed, the following pages and lines from Volterra's Opposition should also be sealed: 13
* 4:13-24; 5:22-23; 15:8-16; 16:1-28; 17:1-21, 23, 27-28; and 18:4-11.
Volterra is hereby directed to file a revised redacted version of said opposition, redacting 15 only the information on pages and lines 2:16-17; 4:13-24; 5:22-23; 15:8-16; 16:1-28; 17:1-21, 23, 16 27-28; and 18:4-11, by no later than November 16, 2012. 17
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...