Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kingsburg Apple Packers Inc. Kingsburg v. Ballantine Produce Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 15, 2012

KINGSBURG APPLE PACKERS INC. KINGSBURG ORCHARDS, ET. AL. PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BALLANTINE PRODUCE CO., INC., ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
RJO PRODUCE MARKETING, INC., INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF,
v.
BALLANTINE PRODUCE CO., INC. ET. AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION OF RJO PRODUCE MARKETING, INC. (Doc. Nos. 77, 212)

On August 20, 2010, Plaintiff in intervention RJO Produce Marketing and the Defendants in intervention filed a stipulation for dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a). Although the notice automatically terminated RJO's complaint in intervention, see Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A), the Court will issue an order of dismissal for administrative purposes. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint in intervention filed by Plaintiff in intervention RJO Produce Marketing (Doc. No. 77) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the parties signed Rule 41(a)(1)(A) stipulation (Doc. No. 212).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20121115

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.