The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Suzanne H. Segal United States Chief Magistrate District Judge
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PERSONNEL COMPLAINTS TO BE PRODUCED PURSUANT TO NOVEMBER 8, 2012 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PERSONNEL COMPLAINTS MATTER FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE HONORABLE SUZANNE SEGAL
Pursuant to this Court's November 8, 2012 Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiffs' Motion To Compel Personnel Complaints (Docket No. 62), IT IS SO ORDERED:
1. Good Cause Statement and Confidential Materials. Defendants and Plaintiffs have agreed that the below-listed categories of documents shall be designated confidential documents and/or writings because Defendants believe, in good faith, that these documents and/or writings are protected by the Official Information Privilege and Defendants' rights of privacy, or are otherwise privileged and confidential. Confidentiality will be accomplished by affixing to any responsive document or writing a legend, such as "Confidential", "Confidential Documents," "Confidential Material" or words of similar effect. Documents and writings so designated (hereinafter, collectively, "Confidential Information"), shall be treated in accordance with the terms of this Order. Documents, writings and things to be designated as such, include the following:
All documents responsive to the categories of documents ordered to be produced in the Court's November 8, 2012 Order on Plaintiffs' Motion To Compel Personnel Complaints, which are certain categories of personnel complaints against law enforcement officer Defendants, as set forth in the Court's Order. Specifically, any personnel complaints from February 2005 to the present, alleging the following categories of misconduct against Defendants Christopher Kurtz, Jason Klevos, Marko Milosevich, Mark Caswell, Francisco Quintana, Il Koo Kim, and Rene Flores: (1) excessive or wrongful use of force, (2) false arrests, (3) false statements, (4) dishonesty, (5) misuse of authority, or (6) perjury. 2. Confidential Information. This Protective Order shall apply to all Confidential Information produced by Defendants to Plaintiffs (the "Receiving Parties"). The Confidential Information may be contained in originals and copies of relevant interrogatory responses obtained from Defendants in this matter; originals and copies of relevant documents responsive to the Plaintiffs' requests for production of documents obtained from Defendants in this matter; and originals and copies of transcripts, video recordings, and audio recordings of any deposition taken in this matter during which the Confidential Information is used, mentioned, reviewed, discussed, or referred to. The Confidential Information shall be subject to this Protective Order as follows:
3. Storage Of Confidential Information. Immediately upon production by the Disclosing Party, attorneys for the Receiving Parties shall personally secure and maintain the Confidential Information in their possession. The Confidential Information shall not, under any circumstances, be left in an open or unsecured location where unauthorized persons (such as unauthorized employees of counsel, cleaning personnel, etc.) might have access to them.
4. Confidential Information Legend. All documents containing Confidential Information shall be stamped "CONFIDENTIAL," "CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS," "CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL" or words of similar effect.
5. Limitation Of Use Of Confidential Information. Attorneys for the Receiving Parties shall not cause or knowingly permit disclosure of the contents of the Confidential Information, in any manner, including orally, beyond the disclosure permitted under the terms and conditions of this Order. Any such disclosure shall beconstrued as a violation of this Order, except when used for purposes of this litigation as described in Paragraph Nos. 8 and 9 of this Order.
6. Testimony Regarding The Confidential Information. In the case of depositions, any party may orally, during the deposition, designate all or any portion of the deposition testimony given in this litigation as Confidential Information. Any questions intended to elicit testimony regarding the contents of the Confidential Information shall be conducted only in the presence of persons authorized to review the Confidential Information as provided in this Order. Any deposition transcript containing such questions and testimony shall be subject to the same protections and precautions applicable to the Confidential Information.
7. Inadvertent Disclosure. If the Disclosing Party inadvertently produces any Confidential Information without designating it as such, it may be remedied by
(1) promptly notifying all other parties of the error; and (2) providing a substitute copy of the Confidential Information with a proper legend. In that event, the parties receiving the inadvertently produced undesignated Confidential Information will:
(1) return the previously produced Confidential Information and destroy all copies thereof; and (2) if the party had already disseminated the Confidential Information to any person, the party will notify all such persons in writing of the need to return such Confidential Information and not to further disseminate it.
8. Limitations On The Non-Litigation Use Of Confidential Information. The secrecy and confidentiality of the Confidential Information exchanged during discovery in this action shall be maintained, and all Confidential Information exchanged will be used solely for the litigation of this action. Specifically, the Receiving Parties may not use such documents, records, or other information (or the contents thereof) for any other purpose, including use as background material, or for inclusion in books, magazines, newspapers, or other publications. The Receiving Parties are prohibited from placing any of the Confidential Information on the internet or providing any of the Confidential Information to any category of persons not designated in Paragraph No. 10 of this Order, below.
9. Court Filings. If necessary in the judgment of attorneys for Receiving Parties, said attorneys may show or reveal the contents of the Confidential Information to the court only pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to bind the Court so as to limit or prevent the publication of any Confidential Documents to the jury or factfinder, at the time of trial of this matter, where the Court has deemed such Confidential Documents to be admissible into evidence.
10. Other Persons Authorized To Review Confidential Information. The Parties' attorneys of record may be permitted to see originals and obtain copies of the Confidential Information covered by this Order. Also, Defendants, including officers, directors, employees, and experts thereof may be permitted to review the Confidential Information. Additionally, paralegals, secretaries, expert witnesses, and other individuals and entities that may be employed or retained by the Receiving Parties to assist in the preparation and/or the litigation of this action may be permitted to see originals and obtain copies of the Confidential Information covered by this Order, provided such experts and employees have first executed the written statement set forth in ...