Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ivan Linghon Delacruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 20, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: William B. Shubb

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 498-5700 Attorneys for Defendant IVAN LINGHON DELACRUZ

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO December 18, 2012, AT 9:30 A.M. Date: December 18, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m.

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for November 26, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., and reset it for December 18, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery, to confer with client, and to conduct a forensic examination of computer.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through December 18, 2012, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on December 18, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

20121120

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.