Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fujitsu Limited, Plaintiff v. Belkin International

November 21, 2012

FUJITSU LIMITED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; BELKIN, INC.; D-LINK CORPORATION; D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC.; NETGEAR, INC.; ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; AND ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

A pretrial conference was held on November 1, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. An additional pretrial hearing was held on November 20, 2012, at 3:00 p.m. At the November 20, 2012 pretrial 14 conference, the Court issued the following rulings for the reasons stated on the record: 15

TRIAL SCHEDULE: Trial is set to begin on Monday, November 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and is scheduled to last ten days. On the first day of trial, November 26, 2012, the parties shall convene 16 at 8:30 a.m. Otherwise, the parties will convene at 8:45 a.m. each morning, unless the parties 17 notify the Court otherwise.

LUNCH FOR JURORS:

 The parties' proposal to contribute toward paying for the jurors' lunch during trial is appreciated but declined.

JURY BINDERS AND EXHIBITS:

 By 11:00 a.m. on November 21, 2012, the parties are to bring the jury binders to the Court's chambers.

 Any additional exhibits or documents that must be delivered to the Court shall be delivered to Courtroom 8 rather than the Clerk's office.

PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS: 24

 By November 21, 2012, at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall submit any new objections or 25 responses to the Court's tentative preliminary jury instructions. See ECF No. 392.

FUJITSU'S CORRECTED MOTION TO ENFORCE THE COURT'S ORDERS ON FUJITSU'S MIL#5 AND PRIOR ART [ECF NO. 382]: 27

 In Defendants' list of Prior Art References and Obviousness Combinations, Defendants shall not be permitted to elect or rely on prior art references that were not disclosed in both Defendants' invalidity contentions and expert reports. See Patent Local Rule 3-3; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26; see also ECF No. 307 at 14.

 For the limited purpose of disproving willfulness and active inducement, Defendants shall 3 be permitted to introduce prior art references identified in Defendants' invalidity contentions and expert reports regarding patent claims that were asserted previously in this lawsuit. By November 23, 2012, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.