Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nike, Inc v. Karim Shareef Toney A/K/A Karim Toney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 21, 2012

NIKE, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
KARIM SHAREEF TONEY A/K/A KARIM TONEY, AN INDIVIDUAL AND D/B/A WWW.FRESHTODEAF.COM, WWW.FRESHTODEAF.NET AND FRESHTODEAF AND DOES 1 -- 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. John F. Walter United States District Judge

CONSENT DECREE

The Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation re Entry of Proposed Consent Decree that has been executed by Plaintiff Nike, Inc. ("Nike" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Karim Shareef Toney a/k/a Karim Toney, an individual and doing business as www.freshtodeaf.com, www.freshtodeaf.net and FreshToDeaf ("Defendant") in this action:

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS that the Permanent Injunction and findings made by the Court previously in the Judgment Pursuant to Entry of Default, Docket No. 17, shall remain in effect, and further

ORDERS as follows:

1) The monetary portion only, of the Judgment Pursuant to Entry of Default, Docket No. 17, is vacated.

2) This Consent Decree shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court.

3) The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree.

4) The above-captioned action, shall, upon filing by Plaintiff of the Settlement Agreement, Joint Stipulation Re Entry Of [Proposed] Judgment, Proposed Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation, and requesting entry of judgment against Defendant, be reopened should Defendant default under the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

5) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Defendant for the purpose of making further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this consent decree and judgment; the enforcement hereof; the punishment of any violations hereof, and for the possible entry of a further Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation in this action.

20121121

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.