IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 28, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
KORY ASHTON ORREN
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Sheila K. Oberto
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER
Date February 4, 2013
Time: 1:00 P.M.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above captioned matter now set for December 3, 2012, may be continued to February 4, 2013 at 1:00 P.M.
This continuance is requested by counsel for the defendant. Counsel has been advised that the government will be providing a plea offer to the defendant within the next few days. Defendant is housed at the Lerdo facility in Bakersfield. Counsel will need sufficient time to provide defendant with a copy of the offer and then to meet and discuss the offer with defendant, which will require additional time due to scheduling bus transportation to have defendant brought to Fresno from Lerdo to meet with counsel. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney Brian Enos has no objection to this request.
The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuing plea negotiation purposes.
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DATED: November 27, 2012 /s/ Brian Enos BRIAN ENOS Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DATED: November 27, 2012 /s/ Marc Days MARC DAYS Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant KORY ASHTON ORREN
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause. The Court finds that the interest of justice outweighs the interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.