Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marshall-Edward: Mikels, et al v. Ing Bank

November 28, 2012

MARSHALL-EDWARD: MIKELS, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ING BANK, FSB, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge

ORDER

Plaintiffs, proceeding in propria persona, bring this civil action. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration (Doc. 70) of the Magistrate Judge's October 22, 2012, order (Doc. 65).

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The October 22, 2012, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 70) is denied;

2. The Magistrate Judge's October 22, 2012, order is affirmed; and

3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

20121128

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.