Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Big Boy Franchise Management, LLC, A Michigan Limited Liability Company v. Sleepy Hollow Enterprises

November 29, 2012

BIG BOY FRANCHISE MANAGEMENT, LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;
BIG BOY RESTAURANTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SLEEPY HOLLOW ENTERPRISES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY;
MATTHEW PIKE; ANGELA PIKE; NOAH PIKE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge

JS-6

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER

Plaintiffs, Big Boy Franchise Management, LLC ("BBFM"), and Big Boy Restaurants International, LLC ("BBRI"), have filed a Complaint for (1) Trademark Infringement/Violation of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §§1051 et seq. -- Declaration of Rights/Damages/Injunctive Relief, (2) Common Law Statutory Trademark Infringement/Violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§14200 et seq., (3) Breach of Franchise Agreement, and (4) Past Due Account against Defendants, Sleepy Hollow Enterprises, LLC ("Sleepy Hollow"), Matthew Pike, Angela Pike, and Noah Pike.

The Complaint alleges: (1) that Defendant Sleepy Hollow, as franchisee, entered into franchise agreements with plaintiff BBFM, as franchisor, with respect to Big Boy Restaurants located in Barstow, California, and Baker, California;

(2) that Defendants Matthew Pike, Angela Pike, and Noah Pike signed a written personal guaranty of all of defendant Sleepy Hollow's obligations and duties under the franchise agreements;

(3) that Defendants breached the franchise agreement by failing to pay amounts owing to Plaintiff BBFM under the franchise agreements;

(4) that Plaintiff BBFM sent Notices of Monetary Default to Defendants providing for a ten-day cure period to cure the monetary defaults as required by the franchise agreements;

(5) that Defendants failed to take any action to cure the defaults; (6) that plaintiff BBFM then sent Notices of Termination to Defendants terminating the franchise agreements and requiring Defendants to immediately de-identify the restaurants pursuant to the terms of the franchise agreements;

(7) that Defendants continued thereafter to operate the restaurants as "Bob's Big Boy" restaurants and that such actions constituted trademark infringement in violation of federal and state laws; and

(8) that Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of damages, prejudgment interest, attorney's fees and costs against Defendants, and a preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendants enjoining them from using the Big Boy trademarks registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent Office and which provide brand identity for the Big Boy® system, including but not limited to, United States registered trademark number 913,601 ("Big Boy"), United States registered trademark number 1,230,170 ("Bob's Big Boy") United States registered trademark number 910,758 (standing Big Boy design), and United States registered trademark number 1,230,570 ("Bob's Big Boy Restaurants"), and from holding themselves out as a Big Boy franchisee and compelling them to fully comply with their obligations under Article 22 of the franchise agreements.

Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to settle this case in accordance with the terms of this Stipulated Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order and have voluntarily entered into a Stipulation for Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order which provides that the Court should enter this Stipulated Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order.

Defendants admit that the Court has jurisdiction over them and over the subject matter of this action. Defendants consent to the entry, without further notice, of this Stipulated Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order.

Defendants waive the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants further waive any right they may have to appeal from this Stipulated Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order.

Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over them for the purpose of implementing, enforcing, modifying, or amending this Stipulated ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.