Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Buena Marshall

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 29, 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
BUENA MARSHALL DEBORAH LOUDERMILK, REGINALD DODSON, SR., AND KADESTA HARRIS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 "I" Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2790

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Michael M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, defendant Buena Marshall, through his counsel of record, Clyde M. Blackmon, defendant Deborah Loudermilk, through her counsel of record, James T. Reilly, defendant Reginald Dodson, Sr. through his counsel of record, Dina L. Santos, and Kadesta Harris through her counsel of record, J Toney, hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference set for November 30, 2012, be continued to January 18, 2013.

The parties need additional time for preparation. Therefore, the parties have agreed and respectfully request that the Court set the date of January 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., for the status conference. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that time be excluded pursuant to Local Code T4 - additional time to prepare.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and by stipulation of all parties, it is hereby ordered that the status conference set for November 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to January 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., and that the time beginning November 30, 2012, and extending through January 18, 2013, be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20121129

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.