UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 29, 2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for November 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for December 7, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Counsel for defendant received a plea agreement and requires further time to review, to confer with client, and to prepare.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through December 7, 2012, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). Dated: November 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender /s/ M. Petrik MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys GARY TRUONG Dated: November 28, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ M. Petrik for Jason Hitt JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on December 7, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.