IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 30, 2012
CHARLES T. DAVIS, PLAINTIFF,
D.L. RUNNELS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge
On October 4, 2012, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed September 25, 2012, which denied plaintiff's motion to compel and related motions for sanctions and to modify the scheduling order. The court construes plaintiff's objections as a motion for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed September 25, 2012, is affirmed.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.