Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Levi Strauss & Co v. J Brand

December 3, 2012

LEVI STRAUSS & CO., PLAINTIFF,
v.
J BRAND, INC.,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

9 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 16, the Court issues the following Case 10 Management Order.*fn1 Failure to comply with this Order is cause for sanctions under Rule 16(f). All 11 questions should be directed to Rose Maher, Courtroom Deputy, at (415) 522-4708. 12

A. ADR: The parties are referred to mediation.

13 B. Pretrial Motions: All pretrial motions shall be filed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7,

14 dispositive motions shall be filed, served, and noticed by 10/4/2012. Any summary judgment motion shall include a joint statement of undisputed facts pursuant to Civil Local

15 Rule 56-2(b). The Court shall hear dispositive motions on 11/8/2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, located on the 15th Floor of the Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,

For the Northern District of California For the Northern District of California

U

U No discovery disputes may be brought to the Court's attention more than 10 days after the

20 discovery cut-off date.

21 D. Deadline to Amend Pleadings: 6/11/2012. 22

E. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: Any party wishing to present expert witness testimony shall serve on all other parties the expert's name, address, qualifications, resume, and a 23 written report in compliance with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) by 8/10/2012. This disclosure must be made with respect to a person who is either: (a) specifically retained or specially employed to 24 provide expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702; or (b) a regular employee or agent or treating physician who may be called to provide expert opinion 25 testimony. All parties have a continuing duty to supplement the disclosure of expert witnesses when required under Rule 26(e)(1). 26 F. Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witnesses: Any expert testimony intended solely to 27 contradict or rebut another party's opinion testimony shall be disclosed in compliance with 28

C and noticed for hearing on any Thursday at 10:00 a.m., without ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.