UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 3, 2012
TEOFILIO MEJIA, ET AL.,
WEEKS WHOLESALE ROSE GROWER, INC., ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL, SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS AND TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION
On October 19, 2010, Defendant Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc., filed a notice of filing bankruptcy. (Doc. 6) Soon thereafter, on December 3, 2010, the Court issued is acknowledgement of the bankruptcy filing and ordered, "Plaintiff shall obtain an order for relief from stay of bankruptcy as to said Defendants, or give notice of its intent to proceed with the balance of this action as to all other Defendants except as to the bankrupt parties. Plaintiff shall notify the court within 45 days as to the actions it has taken." (Doc. 7, emphasis added) Despite this, Plaintiffs have never responded to the Court's order and the matter has languished.
Within 10 days, Plaintiffs SHALL show cause why sanctions should not
be imposed, up to and
including an order of dismissal, based upon Plaintiffs' failure to
comply with the Court's orders and its 4 failure to prosecute this
action. 5 6
IT IS SO ORDERED. 7
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.