Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shane E. Rosenthal v. Michael J. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 3, 2012

SHANE E. ROSENTHAL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Allison Claire United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On October 3, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand within twenty-one days of the order. Dckt. No. 20. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Id. Plaintiff failed to comply with the October 3, 2012 order. On November 1, 2012, the court, noting that plaintiff was not represented by counsel, provided plaintiff one final opportunity to file his motion for summary judgment, which was to be filed within fourteen days of the November 1, 2012 order. Dckt. No. 21. Plaintiff was again warned that failure to comply with the court's order would result in dismissal of this action. Id. The period for compliance has once again run, and plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and to comply with court orders and Local Rules; and

2. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

20121203

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.