Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass v. Safeco Door & Hardware

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA


December 5, 2012

GLAZIERS, ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS WORKERS PENSION PLAN, ET AL.
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SAFECO DOOR & HARDWARE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DBA AHC GLASS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan Illston

DECLARATION OF MICHELE R. STAFFORD IN SUPPORT THEREOF; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 15 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

For good cause shown below, Plaintiffs herein respectfully request that the Court vacate 19 the calendar in this Action, and conditionally dismiss this matter without prejudice pending 20 Defendant remaining current in contributions through the month of September 2013.

1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed to compel Defendant's 22 compliance with its obligations under the Collective Bargaining Agreement to which it is 23 signatory. Plaintiffs filed suit on September 7, 2012 for payment of contributions due them for the 24 month of July 2012, and for liquidated damages and interest accrued on late-paid contributions for 25 the months of January through July 2012.

2. Prior to service, Defendant advised that it would pay all amounts due. Defendant 27 recently submitted payment of all amounts due, including attorneys' fees and costs, and one-half 28 of the accrued liquidated damages. As Defendant has been continuously delinquent in payment of contributions, the remaining 50% will be conditionally waived by the Plaintiffs' Board of Trustees 2 contingent upon Defendant remaining current in their contributions through the month of 3 September 2013. 4

3. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court therefore conditionally dismiss this 5 matter without prejudice. 6

4. Should Defendant fail to remain current in contributions, Plaintiffs are authorized 7 to ask that the Court reopen this matter. 8

5. Plaintiffs have not previously filed or dismissed any similar action against Defendant and Defendant has not answered or otherwise appeared in this action. 10 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above 9 11 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.

Executed this 4th day of December, 2012, at San Francisco, California.

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION By: /s/ Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

This case shall be dismissed without prejudice, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction of the 19 matter to enforce the term for the conditional waiver of liquidated damages, if necessary.

20121205

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.