Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Esmeralda Ocampo, et al v. Weeks Wholesale Rose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 5, 2012

ESMERALDA OCAMPO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WEEKS WHOLESALE ROSE GROWER, INC., ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL (Doc. 11)

On December 3, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why the matter should not be dismissed based upon their failure to comply with the Court's orders and to prosecute this action. (Doc. 10) This order was based upon the Court's earlier order in which Plaintiffs' were required to notify the Court whether it would pursue any non-bankrupt defendants in this action or whether they would proceed only in bankruptcy court against Defendant Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. (Doc. 6)

On December 3, 2012, Plaintiffs responded and noted that their failure to notify the Court that they would proceed only in the bankruptcy action filed by Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc., was inadvertent. (Doc. 11) In addition, Plaintiffs reported that the bankruptcy action has concluded and this matter should be dismissed. Id. at 2.

Therefore, based upon the request of Plaintiffs, the Court ORDERS:

1. The request to dismiss this matter is GRANTED;

2. Because this order terminates this litigation in its entirety, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20121205

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.