UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 5, 2012
LEIF BERGMAN AND BERGMAN LANDSCAPE INC., PLAINTIFFS,
MICHAEL P. TOBIN, HOLLY W. TOBIN, STEEL VENTURES, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BOB VANELLA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Document 56)
Plaintiffs Leif Bergman and Bergman Landscape Inc. ("Plaintiffs") filed a complaint on September 26, 2011.*fn1 (Doc. 1). On that same day, Plaintiffs recorded two Notices of Pendency of the Action. (Doc. 32-3, Exs. A and B). Pending before the Court is Defendants Michael and Holly Tobins' ("Defendants") Motion to Expunge the Lis Pendens. (Docs. 32 and 34). As part of the Motion, Defendants requested attorney's fees and dismissal of the action.
On November 9, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendants' Motion to Expunge the Lis Pendens be denied and that the requests for attorney's fees and dismissal be denied. (Doc. 56). The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties with instructions that any objections be filed within fifteen (15) days.
On November 21, 2012, Defendants did not file objections, but instead filed a document entitled, "Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of the Magistrate Judge's Ruling." (Doc. 57). The parties were advised that the Court was construing this motion as objections. The other parties were advised that any Response to the objections must be filed no later than December 4, 2012. On December 4, 2012, Plaintiffs filed their Response. (Doc. 59).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations dated November 9, 2012 (Doc. 56), are ADOPTED IN FULL. Defendants' Motions to Expunge Lis Pendens be denied. Similarly, Defendants' request for attorney's fees and their request for dismissal of this action also be denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.