UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 6, 2012
IN RE MARCIANO
Bk. Case No. 1:11-BK-10426-VK
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Stephen Montes Not Reported
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)
One of Debtor-Appellant Georges Marciano's main arguments in this appeal is that the bankruptcy court's order was erroneous in light of a previous ruling of the Superior Court of Quebec. That ruling, however, was reversed by the Court of Appeal of Quebec on October 23, 2012. Although Bankruptcy Trustee David K. Gottlieb filed a notice of that decision in another appeal, neither party filed any notice in the current appeal. This failure caused the Court to expend substantial time and effort unnecessarily.
Accordingly, both parties are hereby ORDERED to show cause why their respective attorneys should not be sanctioned $250 for their failure to notify the Court of this material development. The parties must respond in not more than five pages by noon on December 13, 2012.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.