Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Beth A. Rhodes, M.D v. Sutter Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION


December 6, 2012

BETH A. RHODES, M.D., PLAINTIFF,
v.
SUTTER HEALTH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
THE GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION'S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENT WITH REDACTION OF COMPENSATION TERMS [E.D. LOCAL RULES 140 & 141] Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb Dept: Courtroom 5, 14th FloorComplaint Filed: January 3, 2012 FAC Filed: March 16, 2012 Trial Date: November 5, 2013 P .C. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SGMF'S

The Court, having considered Defendant SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL FOUNDATION's ("Defendant" or "SGMF") Request to Seal Document with Redaction of Compensation Terms, pursuant to the United States District Court, Eastern District of California Local Rules 140 and 141, and all other papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SGMF's Request to Seal is GRANTED. Because the 2010 Professional Services Agreement ("PSA") between SGMF and Defendant Gould Medical Group, Inc. ("GMG") contains confidential and proprietary information regarding SGMF and GMG which is not available to the public, including but not limited to the terms of the compensation structure, and disclosure of the information could cause financial and competitive injury to SGMF, the Court finds that there are compelling reasons for granting the request. The PSA shall be filed under seal and with the compensation terms redacted from Exhibit 6.2, and kept confidential from public view.

This Order may be subject to rescission or modification upon the written request of any party to this action or any interested third-party for good cause shown.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20121206

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.