Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Connecticut Electric, Inc v. Pacific Coast Breaker

December 6, 2012

CONNECTICUT ELECTRIC, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
PACIFIC COAST BREAKER, INC.; PC SYSTEMS, INC., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

On October 19, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. Dckt. No. 15. The motion was originally noticed for hearing on November 14, 2012; however, on November 8, 2012, pursuant to the parties' request, the hearing was continued to December 12, 2012. Dckt. No. 17.

Local Rule 251(a) provides that the Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least seven days before the scheduled hearing date. E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(a). Local Rule 251(a) also provides that the hearing on a discovery motion may be dropped from calendar without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement is not timely filed. Id.

Although the deadline has passed, the docket reveals that no Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement has been filed in connection with plaintiff's motion to compel. Therefore, that motion, Dckt. No. 15, is denied without prejudice and the December 12, 2012 hearing thereon is vacated.

SO ORDERED.

20121206

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.