Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Allen Ansari v. Electronic Document Processing

December 10, 2012

ALLEN ANSARI,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; DUSTIN K. FERRO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE; ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT ) CONFERENCE

Plaintiff Allen Ansari has filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related ("Motion to Relate"). ECF No. 43. Plaintiff seeks to relate Holmes v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc., Case No. 5:12-CV-6193-HRL, and Paull v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc., Case No. 5:12-CV-06194-PSG, to the instant action. Plaintiff's Motion to Relate is DENIED.

The Case Management Conference scheduled for December 12, 2012 is hereby continued to February 28, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., the date for the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. All case deadlines remain as set forth in the case schedule issued on September 10, 2012. See ECF No. 34.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3

20121210

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.