Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shelly Conte, An Individual; Cindy Reichman, An Individual v. Jakks Pacific

December 10, 2012

SHELLY CONTE, AN INDIVIDUAL; CINDY REICHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND DOES 1 TO 25,
DEFENDANTS.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, COUNTER-CLAIMANT,
v.
SHELLY CONTE, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND CINDY REICHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, COUNTER-DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs. 42, 44, 45)

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman (collectively "Plaintiffs") have brought an action for patent infringement against Defendant Jakks Pacific, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Jakks"). Jakks has filed counterclaims against Plaintiffs. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss four of Jakks' five counterclaims. Jakks opposed the motion, and Plaintiffs have filed a reply. Upon careful consideration of the parties' submissions and the entire record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part with leave to amend and DENIES in part Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Plaintiffs are the exclusive licensees of all right, title, and interest in United States Patent No.

6,494,457 ("the '457 Patent") issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 17, 2002. The '457 Patent relates to (1) an object that is capable of being hidden, (2) a transmitter unit associated with the hidden object, and (3) a seeker unit containing a receiver and a means for calculating the distance between the seeker unit and the transmitter unit. Plaintiffs have incorporated the patent into a toy doll that they manufacture, "Hide-N-Seek Hayley," which allows a child to play an interactive game of hide and seek by relaying clues to the child based on his or her proximity to the doll.

In or around 2005, Jakks began marketing Care Bear dolls under license from the owner of the Care Bears trademark. One of these Care Bear dolls marketed by Jakks is the "Hide 'N Seek Care Bear" doll. Plaintiffs contend that the Hide 'N Seek Care Bear doll infringes Plaintiffs' '457 patent. Like the Hide-N-Seek Hayley, the Hide 'N Seek Care Bear consisted of: (1) a plush toy doll capable of being hidden; (2) a transmitter device attached to the toy doll; and (3) a seeker unit capable of receiving various clues depending on its proximity to the toy doll.

On or about December 22, 2010, Plaintiffs, through counsel, sent a letter ("the December 22 letter") to several of Jakks' customers, including Toys 'R Us and Target, through whom Jakks was marketing Hide 'N Seek Care Bear dolls. The letter stated that "[t]he concept and design for [Hide 'N Seek Care Bear] and its capabilities are nearly identical to those of Hide 'N Seek Hayley, which is patented, trademarked, and copyrighted to Ms. Shelly Conte and Ms. Cindy Reichman" and requested that the stores provide sales information for the Care Bear toys.

B. Procedural History

Plaintiffs filed their original complaint in this case on December 20, 2011. They filed an amended complaint on April 3, 2012. Defendant Jakks filed an answer and counterclaims on August 13, 2012. Plaintiffs filed the instant motion to dismiss four of Jakks' five counterclaims on September 27, 2012. Defendant Jakks filed an opposition on November 5, 2012, and Plaintiffs filed a reply on November 13, 2012.

Plaintiffs and Defendant have also engaged in other litigation relating to Jakks' alleged infringement of Plaintiffs' '457 patent. Relevant to the instant motion, Jakks previously brought action against plaintiffs Conte and Reichman in district court in New Jersey seeking declaratory relief. On December 30, 2011, the New Jersey district court granted Conte and Reichman's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction over them. Jakks Pacific v. Conte and Reichman, 2011 WL 6934856 (Dec. 30, 2011).

Having considered the parties' arguments and the relevant law, this Court issues this order.

DISCUSSION

Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.