UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 13, 2012
PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT,
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC,
DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS
("SanDisk") and Round Rock Research LLP ("Round Rock") hereby stipulate to dismiss the 27 following causes of action. SanDisk stipulates to dismiss its first cause of action (Declaratory 28 Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,021,520) without prejudice. Round Rock stipulates to Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), SanDisk Corporation dismiss the tenth count of its counterclaims (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,021,520) with 2 prejudice. 3 4
Dated: December 13, 2012 VINSON & ELKINS LLP By: /s/ Chuck P. Ebertin Chuck P. Ebertin Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant SANDISK CORPORATION Dated: December 13, 2012 DESMARAIS LLP By: /s/ John C. Spaccarotella John C. Spaccarotella (admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC
Civil L.R. 5-1(i)
I, Chuck P. Ebertin, hereby attest that John Spaccarotella has concurred in the filing of this 18 document. 19
By: /s/ Chuck P. Ebertin
Chuck P. Ebertin
Pursuant to the above stipulation, SanDisk's first cause of action (Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,021,520) is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the 4 above stipulation, Round Rock's tenth count of its counterclaims (Infringement of U.S. Patent 5 No. 7,021,520) is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 6 7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.