The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior, U.S. District Court Judge
Present: The Honorable RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior, U.S. District Court Judge
Joseph Remigio n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than December 28, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.
* Defendants' Answers to the First Amended Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendants;
* Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Damiano Kigoye.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.
Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all remaining named parties in ...