Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Earnest S. Harris v. R. Lewis

December 13, 2012

EARNEST S. HARRIS, PETITIONER,
v.
R. LEWIS, RESPONDENT.



ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, petitioner has commenced this action in the wrong district.

In a habeas action, venue is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Petitioner was convicted in the Del Norte County Superior Court and is currently confined at Pelican Bay Prison, which is located in Del Norte County. Thus, the Eastern District is not a proper venue for this action. See 28 U.S.C. 84(b).

The court will transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. See Rule 12, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(a), 1404(a). The court declines to take action on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

20121213

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.