Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bernard C. Hughes v. Robert Bruner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 14, 2012

BERNARD C. HUGHES,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT BRUNER,
DEFENDANT.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Doc. 15; Doc. 18) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Bernard Hughes ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 21, 2011. Doc. 1. On April 22, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim and gave Plaintiff leave to amend. Doc. 13. On May 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed the first amended complaint. Doc. 15. On July 18, 2012, the Court filed findings and recommendations recommending to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. Doc. 16. On August 31, 2012, Plaintiff filed objections stating that he was trying to allege a retaliation claim. Doc. 17. On November 11, 2012, the Court vacated its original findings and recommendation filed on July 18, 2012, re-screened Plaintiff's amended complaint based on retaliation and dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Doc. 18.

In the Court's dismissal filed on July 18, 2012, Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims. More than twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that:

1. this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted (Doc. 15; Doc. 18); and

2. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter judgment against Plaintiff.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20121214

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.