Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and System General Corporation v. Fairchild Semiconductor International

December 18, 2012

FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, AND SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND SYSTEM
GENERAL CORPORATION, A TAIWANESE CORPORATION,
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Maxine Chesney

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING NOTICE AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 24 PURSUANT TO RULE 11 AND 35 U.S.C. § 285

Date: N/A Time: N/A Location: Courtroom 7, 19th floor

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO POWER INTEGRATIONS' AND [PROPOSED ORDER]

Before: Hon. Judge Maxine Chesney

In view of the upcoming holidays and the current response deadline of December 26, 2012 2 to Power Integrations' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 and 35 U.S.C. § 285 and the 3 current reply deadline of January 2, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, 4 hereby stipulate and agree to postpone the deadlines by approximately one week, and propose the 5 following schedule for briefing and hearing of this motion: 6 7

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Opposition to Motion December 26, 2012 January 4, 2013 9 Reply In Support of Motion January 2, 2013 January 11, 2013 Hearing January 18, 2013 January 25, 2013

Dated: December 17, 2012 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Michael R. Headley Attorneys for Plaintiff POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. Dated: December 17, 2012 MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP By: /s/ Jeremy T. Elman Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20121218

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.