IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
December 18, 2012
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, AND SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND SYSTEM
GENERAL CORPORATION, A TAIWANESE CORPORATION,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Maxine Chesney
ELECTRONIC CASE FILING NOTICE AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 24 PURSUANT TO RULE 11 AND 35 U.S.C. § 285
Date: N/A Time: N/A Location: Courtroom 7, 19th floor
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO POWER INTEGRATIONS' AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Before: Hon. Judge Maxine Chesney
In view of the upcoming holidays and the current response deadline of December 26, 2012 2 to Power Integrations' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 and 35 U.S.C. § 285 and the 3 current reply deadline of January 2, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, 4 hereby stipulate and agree to postpone the deadlines by approximately one week, and propose the 5 following schedule for briefing and hearing of this motion: 6 7
Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Opposition to Motion December 26, 2012 January 4, 2013 9 Reply In Support of Motion January 2, 2013 January 11, 2013 Hearing January 18, 2013 January 25, 2013
Dated: December 17, 2012 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Michael R. Headley Attorneys for Plaintiff POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. Dated: December 17, 2012 MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY LLP By: /s/ Jeremy T. Elman Attorneys for Defendants FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, and SYSTEM GENERAL CORPORATION
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.