Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hardline Design LLC v. Edge International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


December 18, 2012

HARDLINE DESIGN LLC,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC; AND, B8 CONCEPT LTD., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge

COMAR LAW D. Inder Comar (SBN 243732) inder@comarlaw.com 901 Mission Street, Suite 105 3 San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone: .415.640.5856 4 Facsimile: .415.513.0445 5 Attorney for Plaintiff HARDLINE DESIGN LLC

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND 45-DAY STAY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AND ALL RELATED CROSS CLAIMS

Judge: The Honorable Richard Seeborg Trial Date: N/A Action Filed: July 30, 2012

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant HARDLINE DESIGN LLC ("Hardline") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff EDGE INTENATIONAL, LLC ("Edge") respectfully file this joint stipulation and proposed order.

WHEREAS the parties jointly stipulated to and this Court ordered on November 5, 2012 a 45-day stay;

WHEREAS the parties are currently engaging in good-faith settlement discussions with respect to all claims and cross-claims;

WHEREAS the parties believe that a further stay would be appropriate to permit more developed settlement discussions, and if necessary, to permit the filing of an arbitration between the parties in a manner consistent with the first stipulation granted by the Court;

THEREFORE Hardline and Edge stipulate to extend the 45-day stay of the case another 45 days to permit further settlement discussions and/or the filing of an arbitration consistent with the first stipulation granted by the Court.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all counsel for all parties.

/s/ Inder Comar D. Inder Comar

20121218

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.