Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ruth Allee-Singh v. Vicory

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 19, 2012

RUTH ALLEE-SINGH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
VICORY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a former county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On November 13, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim.*fn1 The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in this action being dismissed. The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.