STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: October 16, 2012
("ABLE"), to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendant Crown Building Maintenance Co., doing business as Able Building Maintenance Co. 3
1. On October 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint pursuant to Sections 502 and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), alleging Defendant ABLE has failed to pay in full certain contributions due and owing to the SEIU Pension Fund. 2. On November 16, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint generally alleging Defendant ABLE failed to make additional contributions that it was required to make.
3. On December 3, the parties entered into a stipulation extending the time for ABLE to respond to the First Amended Complaint to December 17, 2012. 4. For good cause, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that a response to the First Amended Complaint in this action shall be due no later than December 28, 2012. The parties hereby aver that the date will not alter the date of any event or delay any deadline already set by the Court.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant ABLE to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint to no later than December 28, 21
DATED: December 17, 2012 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Kevin D. Reese 5 Charles L. Thompson, IV Kevin D. Reese 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 CROWN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CO. 8 9 DATED: December 17, 2012 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 10 11 12 By: /s/ Kimberly A. Hancock Phillip M. Miller 13 Kimberly A. Hancock 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, et al.
Hon. United States District Court Judge
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...