The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Judge
Present: The Honorable A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)
ORDER RE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE TWO
This Order reflects the Court's findings and rulings at, and following, the hearing that was held on December 13, 2012.
1. Special Master Saletta shall prepare and file a Roster of the individuals who have been, or will continue to be, responsible for or involved in the implementation of the Settlement Agreement. The roster should contain the titles of the individuals who are identified. The entries should be organized according to agency, status or affiliation. The agencies or affiliations shall include CDSS, DHCS, L.A. County, CWDA, CMHDA, Parent and Youth Representatives, counsel and others.
2. The Special Master shall prepare and file a comprehensive timeline containing the dates, in sequence, by which or on which all of the remaining developments or deadlines are to occur.
3. Phases One and Two of the Implementation Plan are reasonably and sufficiently calculated to meet the terms and objectives in Paragraphs 19 and 20 of the Settlement Agreement, except as provided below. The state is ORDERED to carry them out.
4. The Court adopts and slightly modifies the Special Master's Recommendation 2, as follows:
"Because the ACO Taskforce (described in Section VI, Data and Quality Assurance, Phase Two) will not be convened until after the December 13, 2012 hearing date, the work plan for that task force is still being developed, and because there is uncertainty as to how the ACO work plan will be coordinated with other accountability and quality assurance activities required to be implemented by the Department of Health Care Services, the Special Master requests additional time to review the work plan and observe the Taskforce. The Special Master will submit a supplemental Special Master report on the progress of the ACO Taskforce and such other matters as he sees fit by March 1, 2013, at which time the Special Master will expect to have sufficient information to determine if it meets the terms and objectives of the Settlement Agreement."
5. The Court adopts Recommendation 4 of the Special Master, as Follows:
"The Special Master further requests and recommends that if, during court jurisdiction, either party seeks to modify the Implementation Plan, any modification must be agreed to by the parties. In the event the parties cannot reach agreement regarding any proposed modification of the Implementation Plan during the period of court jurisdiction, either party may seek to mediate the dispute with the Special Master or any other mutually acceptable mediator, consistent with the dispute resolution process provided for in the Settlement Agreement. If the dispute cannot be resolved, then during court jurisdiction, either party may file a motion ...