Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The Board of Trustees, In Their Capacities As Trustees of the v. Sierra Equipment Rental

December 21, 2012

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND LABORERS TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SIERRA EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Maria Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Date: December 27, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Room: B, 15th Floor Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-10, Plaintiffs hereby request that the Case Management

Conference scheduled for December 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. be continued for ninety (90) days to 26 allow Plaintiffs to either amend the complaint or to file a Motion for Default Judgment. 27

Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case on March 5, 2012. Defendant Sierra Equipment

ROSENFELD

WEINBERG, ROGER & A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Rental, Inc., a California Corporation ("Defendant") was served by substituted service, which was Alameda, California 94501

deemed complete April 28, 2012. Plaintiffs are currently seeking relief through Defendant's 2 payment bond. Plaintiffs believe they are entitled to recovery from this bond, and will amend the 3 complaint to name the bond company as an additional defendant if they are not able to voluntarily 4 resolve the bond claim. Therefore, although Defendant is in default, Plaintiffs have not yet 5 requested an entry of Default. 6

Plaintiffs will either amend the complaint to name the insurance company, or will seek an 7 entry of default against Defendant, and then move for default judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiffs 8 respectfully request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference set for December 9 27, 2012 for ninety (90) days, to allow time for amendment or for a Motion for Default Judgment 10 to be heard. 11

The above stated facts are set forth in the accompanying declaration of Daniel S. Brome in Support of Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference, filed herewith. 13

Dated: December 20, 2012 Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld A professional corporation /S/ Daniel S. Brome By: DANIEL S. BROME Attorneys for Plaintiff ROSENFELD WEINBERG, ROGER & A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference and Declaration of Daniel S. Brome in support thereof, the Court orders the continuance of the case management conference for ninety (90) days, or as soon thereafter as a 4 court date is available. In addition, the Court Orders: 5 6 7

WEINBERG, ROGER & A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 ROSENFELD Alameda, ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.