Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Dale Howard v. City of Ridgecrest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 28, 2012

WILLIAM DALE HOWARD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF RIDGECREST, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Doc. 17)

Before the Court is the second stipulation to continue the scheduling conference. (Doc. 17)

As in the first stipulation, the parties assert they wish to have settlement discussions. Id. They provide no explanation why these efforts could not have occurred in the month-long extension of time the Court granted previously nor do they detail the efforts that they will make in the event the conference is continued. Therefore, the parties have failed to establish good cause for the stipulated continuance and the stipulation is DENIED.

Having failed to do so thus far, the parties SHALL file their joint scheduling conference statement no later than January 2, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20121228

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.