IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 2, 2013
BANK OF AMERICA NA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff's second motion for leave to further amend the complaint (Doc. 24). As with the prior motion for leave to amend, the current motion will be denied for the same two reasons. First, plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint. Plaintiff's failure to do so makes it impossible for the court to evaluate whether leave to amend should be granted. Second, plaintiff's motion was not properly noticed for hearing before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (Doc. 24) is denied without prejudice.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.