UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 3, 2013
MARTINGALE INVESTMENTS, LLC, PLAINTIFF,
MARIO I CALLIRGOS AND ANNA M CALLIRGOS, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. No. 5]
Presently before the court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Because Defendants have not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion.
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.
The hearing on Plaintiff's motion was set for January 14, 2013.*fn1 Defendants' opposition was therefore due by December 24, 2012. As of the date of this Order, Defendants have not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Defendants' failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to remand, and GRANTS the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.