Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Lori Zoval

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 3, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
LORI ZOVAL DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, JR United States District Court Eastern District of California

DEFENSE MOTION FOR COURT ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR SELF SURRENDER TO JANUARY 25, 2013:PROPOSED ORDER DECLARATION OF COUNSEL; DATE: January 4, 2013 __________________________ Time: 9:00 a.m. Jr.

Judge: Garland E. Burrell

Defendant Lori Zoval was ordered to self surrender for service of her 44 month sentence by this court and has been ordered to surrender by 2: 00 p.m. January 4, 2013.

Ms. Zoval has not yet (as of December 31, 2012) been designated for a prison facility by the Bureau of Prisons, hereinafter "BOP." While the process normally takes several weeks for the BOP to designate a prison, in this case that process was unavoidably delayed through no fault of Ms. Zoval. The judgment and commitment order was not received by the BOP for several weeks after the sentencing date, as the court was not able to obtain the exact names and addresses of the restitution victims until the same was provided by the probation department on November 26, 2012.

Because the BOP received the judgment on November 26 2012, they have not yet finalized their work in designating a facility.

Attorney Mark Reichel spoke over the telephone on December 31, 2012 with Laura Davis, Criminal Records Specialist with the US Marshal's Service in Sacramento, at 916 930 2062. Ms. Davis advised that the BOP was attempting to find a facility for Ms. Zoval which could handle her medical needs, and as such, there had been a further delay in designating a facility. Ms. Davis advised that the process is taking this much time as the designation process is very "backed up" at present. Ms. Davis told counsel that it would be a good idea to request more time from the court, and that it would be better for everybody involved if the self surrender date was extended. If Ms. Zoval has to turn herself in to the jail then the US Marshals Service will be responsible for her medical needs and the scarce jail space will be used not for a pretrial detainee, and the US Marshal's Services will be responsible for transporting Ms. Zoval from the jail to her eventual designated facility. (See Declaration of Mark J. Reichel).

Ms. Zoval has never been in a jail facility before, and this is her first criminal conviction. She was convicted of a white collar fraud crime, with the events occurring in 2006, over 6 years ago. She is the single mother of a 16 year old son. If she is not allowed to self surrender to a BOP facility, she will have to surrender and begin serving her sentence at the Sacramento County Jail. The Sacramento County Jail is set up and designed as a pre trial facility, not necessarily the type of facility to provide the benefits and corrective assistance for the service of a federal sentence which the BOP normally provides inmates serving a sentence.

Defense counsel has met and conferred with opposing counsel, and has requested that the United states agree to such an extension of time. This was made through voicemail and e mail. He was informed that Ms. Skipper will not be back in to the office until Wednesday, January 2, 2013. Defense counsel therefore must file this and request placement on the Court's calendar as soon as possible, before January 4, 2013, at 2: 00 p.m., the current surrender date.

DATED: December 31, 2012 Respectfully submitted, /s/ MARK J. REICHEL MARK J. REICHEL Attorney for Defendant

DECLARATION OF MARK J. REICHEL

I, Mark J. Reichel, hereby Declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing si true and correct.

I am the attorney for defendant Lori Zoval. I have drafted the statements set forth in this Motion and know the contents thereof, and I know them to be true.

I was informed in late November via e mail from the United States Marshal's Service that because they had received the judgment from sentencing in this case so late, they had not started the designation process and would not be able to meet the turn in deadline for Ms. Zoval.

I know that the judgment was not finalized because the court did not have the names and addresses of the victims for the order on restitution from the probation department until November 26, 2012.

On December 31, 2012, I spoke over the telephone with Laura Davis, Criminal Records Specialist with the US Marshal's Service in Sacramento, at 916 930 2062. Ms. Davis advised that the BOP was attempting to find a facility for Ms. Zoval which could handle her medical needs, and as such, there had been a further delay in designating a facility. Ms. Davis advised that the process was very "backed up" and that it would be a good idea to make a request for additional time, and that it was in fact better for everyone if Ms. Zoval were allowed self surrender to the designated institution.

On December 31, 2012, I left a voice message for opposing counsel on this request, and also sent an email on the subject. I was advised via e mail that opposing counsel will not return until Wednesday, January 2, 2013 to the office.

DATED: December 31, 2012

/s/Mark J. Reichel

ORDER

On January 3, 2013, defendant's counsel forwarded to the Courtroom Deputy the following email communication which the government sent defense counsel: "In light of the court's previous order, the government takes no position on your request." Therefore, the request is granted. The date for the defendant's self surrender is extended to January 25, 2013. All remaining conditions of the defendant's release shall remain in full force and effect.

Judge Senior United States District GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

20130103

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.