Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Edward Olvera, et al v. County of Sacramento

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 4, 2013

EDWARD OLVERA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carolyn K. Delaney United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order has been noticed for hearing on February 6, 2013. The final pretrial conference is currently set for February 19, 2013 and trial is set for April 23, 2013. Defendants have noticed for hearing on January 28, 2013 a motion for summary judgment.

By order filed November 16, 2012, the scheduling order was modified so as to allow defendants to have their retained expert, Dr. Scott, conduct an IME of plaintiff CHD-O. Defendants were allowed to disclose Dr. Scott no later than December 28, 2012 and pursuant to plaintiffs' request, plaintiffs were also allowed late disclosure of treating physicians Drs. Clopton and Diamond as retained experts. It now appears that before making that request, plaintiffs' counsel had not ascertained whether the treating physicians were willing to serve as retained experts and has now discovered that they will not so serve. Plaintiffs now seek modification of the scheduling order so that they may disclose Dr. Federici, previously disclosed as plaintiffs' retained expert, to provide an expert opinion with respect to the videotaped IME of plaintiff CHD-O and Dr. Scott's report. Plaintiff asserts Dr. Federici's additional report can be provided no later than January 17, 2013.

Given the procedural posture of this case, it appears expedited briefing is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of February 6, 2013 on plaintiffs' motion to modify the scheduling order is vacated.

2. Opposition, if any, to plaintiffs' motion to modify the scheduling order shall be filed no later than January 10, 2013.

3. Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than January 14, 2013.

4. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted.

20130104

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.