UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 4, 2013
CIXTO CRUIZ MURILLO,
RONALD COULARD, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR COPIES (Doc. 20)
INFORMATIONAL ORDER REGARDING ) ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND TERMINATION JUDGE
OF THE ACTION (Docs. 18-19)
Petitioner is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 23, 2012, the Court dismissed the first amended petition and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. On the same date, judgment was entered, and the judgment and order of dismissal were served on Petitioner by mail. On October 1, 2012, in response to what appeared to be Petitioner's attempt to file an amended petition, this Court sent Petitioner an informational order explaining that the case had been terminated and that the Court would not continue to process Petitioner's filings.
On December 27, 2012, Petitioner filed what purported to be a request for copies of all Petitioner's prior transactions with this Court, despite this Court's having previously stated that Petitioner's filings would not be processed.
Petitioner's request for copies is DENIED. This Court does not provide free copies of documents, and in forma pauperis status does not include the cost of copies.
Petitioner is further INFORMED that the Court will not continue to process his filings in the action in this Court because judgment has been entered and the case terminated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.