Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vashon Tyrone Jackson v. Pam Ahlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 7, 2013

VASHON TYRONE JACKSON,
PETITIONER,
v.
PAM AHLIN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, RESPONDENT.

ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 13) ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC. 1) ORDER REFERRING THE PETITION BACK TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO ORDER

A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION

Petitioner is a person involuntarily committed to state custody pursuant to California's Sexually Violent Predator's Act (SVPA) who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 304.

On November 15, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations to dismiss Petitioner's first through fourth claims without leave to amend as state law claims not cognizable in a proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and to refer the matter back to the Magistrate Judge to direct the filing of a response to the remaining claim in the petition. The findings and recommendations were served by mail on Petitioner on the same date. The findings and recommendations informed Petitioner that objections were due within thirty days of service.

Although the deadline for filing objections has passed, no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file. The Court finds that the report and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1) The findings and recommendations filed on November 15,

2012, are ADOPTED in full; and

2) Petitioner's first through fourth claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend; and

3) The matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge to direct the filing of a response to the remaining claim in the petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20130107

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.