The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
7060 x 13 ILLER F TT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 296 AN x S FFICES OF Mx 415 14 & FAX 15 7070 AW WEISBERG x THIRD FLOOR Lx296 16 TREET x 415 S PHONE 17 ACRAMENTO
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT PROPOSED ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc. and Defendant TT Technologies, Inc., through their counsel of record, stipulate that Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc. may file a First Amended Complaint, which 3 is attached as Exhibit A. Defendant does not stipulate to the factual allegations in the First 4 Amended Complaint and expressly reserves all of its rights and defenses, including those 5 related to jurisdiction. The parties further stipulate that Defendant's answer shall be deemed 6 an answer to the First Amended Complaint such that Defendant need not file an answer to the 7
First Amended Complaint. 8 9
Respectfully submitted, 10 DATE: December 31, 2012. /s/ William S. Weisberg /s/ Christopher R. Smith William S. Weisberg, (SBN 146284), Christopher R. Smith, Pro Hac Vice RANCISCO 7060 13 email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org WEISBERG & MILLER David Allgeyer, Pro Hac Vice LINDQUIST & VENNUM LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff TRIC Tools, Inc. 15 /s/ Duane H. Mathiowetz_______ Duane H. Mathiowetz, (SBN 111931), WEISBERG THIRD FLOOR email@example.com, PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW TREET 415 PITTMAN LLP ACRAMENTO 18 S PHONE 17 Attorneys for Defendant TT Technologies, Inc.
SHALL BE IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: Exhibit A is filed as Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, and Defendant TT Technologies, Inc.'s answer on file with the Court shall be 22 deemed Defendant's answer to the First Amended Complaint. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE 23
THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN JANUARY 15, 2013.
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, U.S. District Court Judge
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...