Social Security No. 0 0 0 0
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 01 07 2013
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Conspiracy in violation of 18 USC 1962(d), as charged in Count 1 of the Indictment The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed on Count 1 of the 32-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: FIFTY-THREE (53) MONTHS.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00, which is due immediately. Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25.00 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
Pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
The Court makes the following findings: the United States formally requested the extradition of defendant from Israel. On or about August 24, 2008, defendant was taken into custody by the government of Israel pursuant to the provisional arrest warrant from the United States. Defendant remained in continuous custody until his extradition to the United States. The government of Israel affirmed the extradition of defendant from Israel to the United States. On or about January 12, 2011, defendant came into the custody of the United States from Israel, pursuant to the extradition warrant from the United States. The time in custody from August 24, 2008 to January 7, 2013, has not been credited against any other sentence. The Court recommends that the period of time from August 24, 2008 to January 7, 2013 is imposed against defendant in this case should be credited toward the sentence that defendant receives in this case. However, the United States Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"), not the Court, makes the determination of credit for defendant's prior custody under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). The Court's recommendation in this paragraph is not binding on the BOP.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three (3) years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office,
General Order 05-02, and General Order 01-05, including the three special conditions delineated in General Order 01-05;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance; During the period of community supervision, the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall comply with the immigration rules and regulations of the United States, and if deported or removed from this country, either voluntarily or involuntarily, not re-enter the United States illegally. The defendant is not required to report to the Probation Office while residing outside of the United States; however, within 72 hours of release from any custody or any re-entry to the United States during the period of Court-ordered supervision, the defendant shall report for instructions to the United States Probation Office, located at the United States Court House, 312 North Spring Street, Room 600, Los Angeles, California 90012; and The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Defendant is informed of his right to appeal.
The Court grants the Government's request to dismiss the remaining counts of the Indictment and the First Superseding Indictment in Case No. CR04-373-RGK.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, may issue a warrant and revoke supervision for a violation occurring during the supervision period.
U. S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge
It is ordered that the Clerk deliver a copy of this Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order to the U.S. ...