Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
James Sheerin v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
January 9, 2013
JAMES SHEERIN
PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Susan IILSTON United States District Court Judge
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT ) TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, JAMES SHEERIN, and Defendant, UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE 3 COMPANY that the Parties agree to dismiss this action in its entirety as to all 4 parties and with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), each Party to bear its 5 own fees and costs. 6 7 ERISA Law Group, LLP
Dated: January 7, 2013 /s/Thornton Davidson
THORNTON DAVIDSON, # 166487
9
thornton@erisalg.com 2055 San Joaquin Street
10
Fresno, CA 93721
11
Attorney for Plaintiff, JAMES SHEERIN
12 13
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &
DICKER LLP
Date: January 7, 2013 /s/ Charan M. Higbee 15
ADRIENNE C. PUBLICOVER, # 161432
adrienne.Publicover@WilsonElser.com
CHARAN M. HIGBEE, No. 148293 Charan.Higbee@WilsonElser.com
525 Market Street-17th Floor San Francisco, California
94105-2725
Attorneys for Defendant,
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case No. 3:12-CV-03799-SI
JAMES SHEERIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER ) DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, have stipulated to a 20 dismissal of the entire action, as to each and every defendant, with prejudice. The 21 Court hereby ORDERS that this action be dismissed with prejudice, in its entity, 22 pursuant to a joint motion of the parties and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 41(a). Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. 24 25
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...