IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
January 9, 2013
E.F. MUSSER; R.P. ROMAN; A. FIEGNER; AND D. HURL, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Carlos T. Bea U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation
Before: Hon. Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judge,
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.
Carlos T. Bea
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.